While browsing in my community library yesterday, I noticed that a book that I had reviewed a year ago, The End of Oil: On the Edge of a Perilous New Future by Paul Roberts, had come out in paperback with a new afterword.
As the book’s title and subtitle imply, experts now recognize that demand for oil may soon exceed the production capacity of even the largest suppliers. The world’s economy is heading for a painful transition, and Roberts makes the case that we are unprepared for it.
The new afterword is hardly comforting. The evidence is mounting that we are approaching or have already reached “Hubbert’s Peak,” when world oil production will be at its maximum, yet the growth in demand continues unabated. The good news is that this seems to be accelerating the development of alternative sources of energy, but there is still no clear technological solution. The “perilous new future” includes not only problems with energy supply but also the possibility of geopolitical turmoil.
Last year, with gasoline prices approaching the then incredible $2.00 per gallon level in the U.S., the Dallas Morning News ran the following review, which was then picked up by a number of nonprofit websites dealing with energy, the environment, and politics.
Now as the price of gasoline is flirting with $3.00 per gallon and with Roberts’ paperback and its new afterword, it’s worth reprising the review here. You can also follow this link to the same review on my Science Shelf Book Review Archive, which includes reviews of a number of other titles at the intersection of science and politics.
Comparative Review of
Out of Gas: The End of the Age of Oil by David Goodstein
(Norton, $21.95, 144 pages, February, 2004)
The End of Oil: On the Edge of a Perilous New Future by Paul Roberts
(Houghton Mifflin, $26.00, 400 pages, May, 2004)
Reviewed by Dr. Fred Bortz
<HRNote: All materials on The Science Shelf are the copyrighted property of Alfred B. Bortz. .
You may also want to read this related book, Twilight in the Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy by Matthew R. Simmons.
The problem is easy to describe, but its consequences are fearsome and its solution daunting. The Age of Oil is coming to an end, and the future is precarious. So say two very different new books with very similar titles: David Goodstein’s Out of Gas: The End of the Age of Oil and Paul Roberts’ The End of Oil: On the Edge of a Perilous New World.
Seeing only the titles, skeptics will react predictably. Despite the current gasoline price spike, we still have plenty of oil. And by the time we start to run low, economic forces will drive technology to develop alternative sources of energy. We’ll do just fine by allowing the market do its magic.
Caltech Distinguished Service Professor Goodstein and noted magazine writer Mr. Roberts accept the doubters’ assumptions, but not their conclusions. Indeed, we have not yet tapped even half of the easily accessible oil, but we will face trouble long before the planetary gas gauge approaches “E.”
In Out of Gas, Dr. Goodstein focuses on the problem itself. A compact tutorial, it begins by citing the work of Shell Oil geophysicist M. King Hubbert, who in the 1950s predicted that U.S. domestic oil production would peak in the 1970s when approximately half of the original resource was depleted. Hubbert’s analysis was derided — until it turned out to be correct. Now experts who apply Hubbert’s method to the world as a whole conclude that the global production peak is only a decade or two in the future. After that, supply will increasingly lag demand. Oil shortages will be permanent and increasingly severe.
Dr. Goodstein follows that bleak news with brief science lessons on thermodynamics, electromagnetism and geology. He then discusses the most promising alternative energy technologies, none of which seems like a sure bet. Our problems are not insoluble, but we can’t afford to delay. To emphasize that point, he closes with this dire warning: “Civilization as we know it will come to an end sometime in this century unless we can find a way to live without fossil fuels.”
But what will the coming crisis look like, what pain will it cause, and what, for that matter, is “civilization as we know it”? In The End of Oil, Mr. Roberts, an expert on the complex interplay of technology, economics and the environment, explores those thorny questions.
He begins with this historical context: Human progress has been the result of transforming energy into wealth. We have used the energy of flowing water and blowing wind, and we have burned dung, wood and coal; but none of these sources have matched oil’s ease of distribution and concentration of energy. Ever since the Spindletop gusher of 1901 demonstrated that oil was plentiful and easily extracted and shipped, we have been living in the Age of Oil.
To understand the path from previous energy ages to the present one, and to make conjectures about our transition to a future without cheap, plentiful oil, Mr. Roberts adopts the perspective of an energy economist. He begins by looking at the likeliest replacement sources of energy, including hydrogen fuel cells, advanced wind and solar power technologies, coal gasification and natural gas.
He also adds two essential ingredients to the mix: global warming and geopolitics. Those create hidden costs that do not (at present) show up in the price of gasoline at United States pumps. Each drop of oil burned adds to the amount of carbon dioxide in the air, which, according to a growing scientific consensus, has already led to an increase in severe weather and consequent economic losses. Politically, the wealth created by oil consumption has been an important factor of American dominance; but because an increasing fraction of that oil must be imported, the major suppliers gain undue influence. We find ourselves in increasingly uncomfortable alliances, needing to assure our economic lifeblood through expensive military means.
Despite the perils ahead, Mr. Roberts proposes a scenario that will enable us to navigate — though not without difficulty — to a future age of sustainable energy use. And just as the readers begin ask whether that approach is realistic, he acknowledges that any number of events may throw us off course. But the transition can’t be avoided. “[U]ltimately,” he concludes, “the question facing us isn’t whether our energy systems will change — indeed, the process is already well underway — but whether we can live with the outcome.”
Click here for a longer review of Out of Gas on the Science Shelf website.